Comparison
Appsolid vs Promon SHIELD
Promon's app-shielding product — mature RASP with Insight monitoring, widely adopted in finance. A strong commercial option.
Built for Android: Purpose-built for Android — focused on DEX packing and native protection.
Head to head
Integration
Post-build — upload a finished APK/AAB; no SDK, no source changes.
A build/wrapping integration step is typical for its runtime protection.
Code protection + hooking
Key entanglement — detection is bound into the decryption key, so under hooking the original code never decrypts (no branch to patch).
Mature RASP (per public material); confirm whether it uses an entanglement-style model with the vendor.
Pricing
Flat per-app pricing — does not scale with users/devices/MAU; publicly listed.
No public list price — quote-based.
Published validation
Published validation: 102 devices, 1,800+ runs, 7-threat e2e, red-team ceiling.
Check with the vendor.
Note: The competitor notes below summarize publicly available material (product pages and docs) as of June 2026; undisclosed features may be missing. Specifications change often — verify the latest details with each vendor's official sources. For uncertain items we avoid attributing anything inaccurate to competitors and state only Appsolid's own position precisely.
Choose Appsolid when
- You're Android-first and want flat pricing with post-build application.
- Published real-device validation matters in your evaluation.
Choose Promon SHIELD when
- Established finance-sector references are important.
- Fraud-ops features like session/risk scoring are required.
Where Promon SHIELD leads (honestly)
- SIEM/SOAR, geo/session correlation and global threat intel (on Appsolid's roadmap).